The incredible inventions of intuitive AI | Maurice Conti technology ai

by noithatSDFGH



디자인 도구에 디지털 신경계를 제공하면 무엇을 얻을 수 있습니까? 생각하고 상상하는 능력을 향상시키는 컴퓨터와 교량, 자동차, 드론 등을 위한 근본적이고 새로운 디자인을 제시하는(그리고 구축하는) 로봇 시스템은 모두 스스로입니다. 미래학자인 Maurice Conti와 함께 증강 시대를 둘러보고 로봇과 인간이 함께 협력하여 혼자서는 할 수 없는 일을 해낼 때를 미리 살펴보세요. TEDTalks는 세계 최고의 사상가와 실천가가 18분(또는 그 이하) 동안 자신의 삶에 대해 이야기하는 TED 컨퍼런스의 최고의 연설과 공연을 매일 제공하는 비디오 팟캐스트입니다. 기술, 엔터테인먼트 및 디자인과 더불어 과학, 비즈니스, 글로벌 문제, 예술 등에 대한 강연을 찾아보십시오. Twitter의 TED 뉴스 팔로우: Facebook의 TED 좋아요: 채널 구독: 에서 다양한 언어로 된 자막과 번역된 자막을 찾아보세요.

Images related to the topic technology ai

The incredible inventions of intuitive AI | Maurice Conti

The incredible inventions of intuitive AI | Maurice Conti

Search related to the topic The incredible inventions of intuitive AI | Maurice Conti

#incredible #inventions #intuitive #Maurice #Conti
The incredible inventions of intuitive AI | Maurice Conti
technology ai
온라인으로 돈을 버는 모든 최신 방법 보기: 여기에서 더 보기
온라인으로 돈을 버는 모든 최신 방법 보기: 여기에서 더 보기

See also  Huawei P50 Pro Unboxing 👍👍 | Huawei Latest Mobiles Technology d technology pro

Related Posts

20 comments

flex 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

Hi, thanks for the video. Do you know if generative design could be used for natural frequency optimization?

Reply
James Yeechun Fung 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

Mr. Conti: thank you

Reply
Sara Graham 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

This isn’t good. How much were those human bamboo manipulators going to be paid? Having the best ANYTHING isn’t worth driving tens of millions of people into poverty. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. I’m so sick of this conversation. All it’s doing is widening the rich/poor gap. If no one has a job with money left over, who’s going to buy all of this stuff?

Reply
Dave Alexander 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

Nobody will believe me, but I said almost the same thing, 40 years ago, after I bought my first IBM PC.. After using it for a while, I cam up with what I call my 2nd Razor, as in Occam's Razor. "The next phase in the evolution of mankind with be a human-computer symbiosis." Those who were knowledgeable enough to understand the words, laughed at me. The rest of the people just said :"Huh?" As of today, we are very far along the road to that status. With the internet, I have the total k knowledge learned the whole human race since mankind started to speak; which was the beginning of accumulation of knowledge through oral tradition. Now it is all no more than a few seconds away. Yesterday, a friend told me he had leukemia. I knew vaguely what it was, ten minutes later I had read three authoritative articles about it, and had a pretty good idea about what he was and would be going through, depending upon the type that he had. The next step in our technology will be to carry a device in our hip pocket which we can pull out ask, "what it leukemia? and I will hear an explanation, with occasional pauses, when it will ask "is this sufficient for your purposes or would you like additional details. The step beyond that will when that communications is through neural links rather than by voice. Such a device could be implanted like my pacemaker, b but I doubt that it will because like cell phones, new and more powerful ones appear every year or so. Implantation my be a option if one were willing to put up with periodic replacements,

Reply
Murdock S 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

The exponential growth alone with AI should heed warning. Every age off progression comes with consequences, a cause and effect if you will. Each of which IMO are also exponential in nature Unknowns, irreversible changes and my favorite the snowball affect. to make such predictions would be careless and When someone says how and why I'll be living as well who or what is decideing such things, no matter how appropriate it may seem can only be counterproductive at best. BTW, most companies unfortunately care only when your not buying something.

Reply
Open Your Eyes 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

Its all good until you give AI the ability to directly effect the outside world, after this point we are doomed.

Reply
Squared Circle 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

In the old days, I was concerned that computer-driven robots would take our manufacturing jobs.
Now I see they will not only make our stuff for us, they will invent and design our stuff for us too, perhaps better than we can ourselves.
I hope our future human Inventors won't feel too inadequate and become discouraged.

Reply
AlexRadic5 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

Imagine future spaceships……. bruhhh we next level…. legit futurama.. what if different species reached a maximum intelligence and we all met up… imagine?? the year 2400

Reply
Paul Varda 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

never ask a computer what to do about climate change! no doubt the answer it would reach is: "kill all humans"

Reply
PK_XIV 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

I saw this video a while back, probably around the time it was published, and really liked it because it blew my mind. Then, I saw it again today since I had to write an essay about TED-talks. And it did not age well… There is something in this talk that makes me uncomfortable. 

First of all, is he trying to sell something? He barely talked about the technologies themselves in favour of 3D renders and theoretical applications, as if he was trying to convince investors. It felt somewhat dishonest. there was also a bunch of fancy sci-fi UI designs and cool shapes distorting ind the background, but why? If your subject is as interesting as you pretend it is, why do you need all of this? I makes me think a lot about Elon Musk, especially in the way the technology is presented, almost as magical. 
(And what's that thing about farming instead of fabricating and aggregating instead of extracting? this feels more like corporate green marketing, and less like a scientist talking about his field of research).

That being said I'm not against being excited about new tech. I understand that AI will be a turning point in our civilisation at some point and it is important to understand what it can do, for exemple optimising physical and computational designs, intuitive man/machine interfaces, rationalising complex data, etc. It WILL revolutionise some sectors, and getting to understand or even develop this at a personal level could become important.

But there are also limits to these technologies, which he does not address. As a commenter brought up, at least for now, if you do not design your constraints precisely, you will end up with something that is not only hard to manufacture, but also terribly suboptimal (I saw someone talk about truss design in a plane and the fact that it could add a lot of weight compared to currently used technics). Moreover, information technologies are badly regulated these days, and a tool as powerful as AI can/already leads to questionable practices (ever heard of GPT-3? it's worth the look although a bit scary). This talk feels strongly oriented as it lacks nuances.

To make it short, I am mad at this video because it is misleading, not very educational, and not worthy, in my mind, of what TED-talks claims to be (it should be an expert's opinion, not an ad for engineering companies). Also, the public opinion regarding AI technologies has matured a lot since then, and is much more critical than it was three years ago. additionally, it could explain my strong reaction.

BTW, my opinion is FAR from perfect and probably overlooks many other aspects that deserves to be covered. I could also have said things that are straight out false. However, it felt necessary for me to nuance what was said in this video, and it is was most likely not a bad thing to write this.

Reply
Bruniau 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

fighting climate change failure has NOTHING to do with cognitive thinking, BASIC HUMAN GREED on the other hand…

Reply
Zi Pei 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

The speaker's grim facial expression and grave tone of speech ooze depression and sadden my computer screen. There's no true enthusiasm in his energy even though he's supposed to be showcasing a "bright future for the creatives"…

Reply
Scott Tillinghast 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

Put tracking chips in barbie dolls!!! Yes! It'll save billions.

Reply
Dorothy Marshall 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

The splendid cathedral phenotypically bore because dew previously match following a acidic penalty. efficient, clear dugout

Reply
Ngyanmol Ngahimit 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

This is exactly what the CEO of skynet will say

Reply
Arek Krolak 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

I want my car to be as German as they go 🙂

Reply
Josh Teshek 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

Anyone else think ai is going too far and it might turn for the worst in the future?

Reply
Jeromy Stewart 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

I can't wait to engage an AI about equality. Exactly who benefits from our economic system? The answer definitely won't be the working class or even the lower class. It's time for a change.

Reply
Herbert Bell 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

So far I'm not enjoying the "autonomy" I have turn signals in my truck that keep blinking after I turn the switch off. I have headlights in that same truck that refuse to turn off when I turn the switch off. What we're making are machines that second guess us and that's not what tools are supposed to do. I do not want a machine that argues with me when I tell it to do something. I want that machine to do what I say when I say it. In the past when a machine failed to do that the word we used to describe it was broken. That meant a linking rod had come loose or a set screw had backed off or a wire had corroded. That's not what's happening now but the end result is the same as if it were. I don't want my machines doing what the designer wants I want them doing what I want that is why I paid money for them in the fist place.

Reply
kenneth tape 19/10/2021 - 4:19 AM

To paraphrase, `what a wonderful world‘ !

Reply

Leave a Comment