Yuval Noah Harari & Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei in Conversation – Davos 2020 technology conversation

by noithatSDFGH



2020년 세계 경제 포럼(World Economic Forum 2020)에서 The Economist 편집장 Zanny Minton Beddoes가 사회를 맡은 Yuval Noah Harari 교수와 Huawei Ren Zhengfei CEO가 참여한 “기술 군비 경쟁에 의해 형성되는 미래”라는 제목의 패널 토론. 그들은 경제와 사회가 유망한 신기술의 큰 잠재력으로부터 충분히 이익을 얻도록 하기 위해 무엇을 할 수 있는지 물어보십시오.

Images related to the topic technology conversation

Yuval Noah Harari & Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei in Conversation - Davos 2020

Yuval Noah Harari & Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei in Conversation – Davos 2020

Search related to the topic Yuval Noah Harari & Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei in Conversation – Davos 2020

#Yuval #Noah #Harari #amp #Huawei #CEO #Ren #Zhengfei #Conversation #Davos
Yuval Noah Harari & Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei in Conversation – Davos 2020
technology conversation
온라인으로 돈을 버는 모든 최신 방법 보기: 여기에서 더 보기
온라인으로 돈을 버는 모든 최신 방법 보기: 여기에서 더 보기

See also  Matrix Code Background Video - computer technology background loop - Free 4k background video technology background video

Related Posts

30 comments

Suhandi Wijaya 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Technology is going to advance no matter what, the problem is not technology, the problem is human. The question is, human integrity, compassion, and understanding can equal that technology or not. So instead of trying to stop technology and science, better train human being to be able to cope with the growth of technology.

Reply
Kave Mohammadi 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Zanny Minton Beddoes, You are very sharp and precise, thanks for moderating the conversation.

Reply
R B 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Bunch of damn wack jobs if u ask me!

Reply
anwiycti 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Facing the rep of a 21century Stalin applicant. To the least, Ren is a materialist and neither has idea about the existential danger nor wishes to address it, he represents a regime who plays fire and pushes limits.

Reply
TheTARANISh 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Harari only promotes technocracy.

Reply
permblue 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

I've watched Harari having conversations with these so-called big shots in tech and AI: Zuckerberg, Fei-fei Li, now Huawei CEO. None of them can match Harari's intelligence and mind. They just talk round and round about cliches (i.e. people are kind by nature; technology generally does more good than bad; people start out being afraid of a new tech but later they learn it's good at all, etc etc) without realizing they are talking like a teenager mind in front of a mature mind like Harari. We need more far-sighted sharp minds in tech, folks!

Reply
Kanade Oda 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

CEOs are similar to politicians in the way they address the public. Leaders from the establishment always talk in the safest terms possible since there are so much at stake for them. So I do not blame Ren personally for painting the future in the brightest way. He definitely is not a dumb optimist, as suggested by his company's strategic preparations for US sanctions, which he mentioned in the talk. I would take away from this conversation the last point which interestingly are shared by both, that is, individuals should also be able to take advantage of such tech advancement to fight against government/corporate surveillance and for collective emancipation.

Reply
L 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Either the Huawei CEO is acting stupid or he really does not understand the nature of intelligence and human nature.

Reply
Lenny McShits 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Do not want.

Reply
prayertous 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

You see the 666 on the O’s of the posters behind them? Committed to decreasing the population of the world …Eugenics#davos

Reply
Ashok Bagad 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Thank

Reply
marcela martins 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Yuval Harari is clearly the only real thinker in Davos and also the only one commited to improving the state of the world.

Reply
Punocchio 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Someone should've told this guy in the front that this was being recorded anyway.

Reply
이슬 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

The like suggestion intrestingly want because page tellingly knit given a well-to-do cut. ludicrous, hesitant begonia

Reply
CC Jelley 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Take home message – we'll get used to being treated like animals on the farm. All for the good then.

Reply
Chris Gadsby 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

The translator didn't reassure me one bit. He talked about rules and limits as concepts only, whereas YNH says we urgently need to have that proper discussion now – before it's too late!

If you remove so many of the jobs with AI and automation, what are the bored, restless people without any purpose going to do? History answers that question, so the antidote is to control and suppress the jobless masses. In the past they were occupied building pyramids. Those with power, know this too, so obviously they have a plan. Just not shared with us yet! How "useful" would adapted bio-tech be in this future scenario….

Reply
N1mBUS Music 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

China really needs to go nuclear, they burn more coal than anybody. its not necessarily there fault, because they have so many people, but still. so important china goes nuclear or the atmosphere will get torched.

Reply
N1mBUS Music 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

less jobs is good. its called basic income. duh.

Reply
N1mBUS Music 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

atomic energy!

Reply
N1mBUS Music 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Davos. gross place. bunch of hypocrites.

nuclear power. nuclear power. nuclear power. nuclear power. nuclear power.

Reply
Asialize Asian Services 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

The fact that Ren Zhengfei focuses on the word "truth" in terms of the main goal in science is groundbreaking for a Chinese state entrepreneur.

Reply
DiabloRouge 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Its interesting these germs pick a country with a real uptight bent about rules and laws, Switzerland is the ultimate nanny state from what Ive seen…just remember billionaires without the grid, without your toys, you are nothing…

Reply
Utility Monster 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Ren is insincere and lying soo much, can't believe it he expect people to buy it

Reply
Joseph Pereira 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Technology is how human intelligence is most strongly manifested. This conversation is primarily about the nature of the singularity.The Prof.’s has always said that he isn’t anti-tech but simply balancing out the conversation from Silicon Valley – I think these conversations are – especially this one, since unlike a conversation (that I would between one of my other favorite authors, Ray Kurzweil) like this includes one of the power players whose opinion – formed by, luckily, more than Trump’s horrifying, essentially Luddite (although that trend did begin with the ban on stem cell research and the lack of scientific literacy is the reason that is allowed to continue – why if I get burned badly here I am fucked, while for example as a Wired article like two years ago, in Europe hospitals don’t even have burn units given the use of stem cells).

Reply
conny asdasd xD 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

When one really manages to see something from the bottom of the abyss, the warning has also seen in the back of your mind. When artificial intelligence or government really understands the bottom of the mentality of some group of humans or human being, then part of that human being will have changed the observer. at that higher level hatred and resentment and prejudice vanish. we live in the universerve or relevances the meaning are links

Reply
Alireza Sheikh 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Something bothering about Prof. Harari is where he comes from. I like the way he analyses things but I really wonder if he is truly a believer in truth, I wonder why such an enlightening icon name should appear next to the imagination of Israel I have in mind ? He could have chosen his name association to any university he liked due to his publicity. Are you really talking about something new or you are risen up because Netahnyaho believes if you are good scientifically people should forget about some aspects of your past cruelty ? Your security there my friend depends on large technological imbalance. You yourself are a conflict of interest between truth and technological imbalance .

Reply
Henry Choy 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

The idea of having AI know people better than they know themselves [22:22] is complete sleight of hand, to hide the truth. Socrates gives us the maxim "Know thyself." But we have version 2.0: "Know thyself. If you need more information, consult the CIA." Meaning that Big Brother already has this information. The question is, who wants to hack you? If anyone has enough power to hack you, that being has so much power, and you are so insignificant, there would be no point to hack you. Indeed, that being would have already accomplished its own desires, and if that being has any desire to thwart you, you would be rendered long before you even think to have a desire that is worth consideration. This is why hacking people is a self contradictory notion. AI might be used to uphold power, but it's really silly to use it for micromanagement. It would be less expensive to render someone by simply dangling diversions.

Reply
mike soo 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

U got a stupid professor arguing. If given a knife u use it to cut meat or u use with evil intent such as robbing n killing ppl. Any tools given u use it for good or bad intend

Reply
kaninchen321 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

Convince me why a world that is ruled by a handful oligarchs and billionaires who want to create a totalitarian dictatorship is supposed to be a better world? Bill Gates went to the patent office in the US to register a chip that will be implanted under the peoples skin and then all people can be controlled at any time. We already had a time in history where humans were marked with a number. We had a time where non conform behaviour could lead to imprisonment, torture or even death. Do we really want these times to come back? A one world government will automatically lead to a dictatorship. Do we really want these old times back again?

Reply
Mike De Visser 17/10/2021 - 9:54 PM

This technology is being built by the elite and their intention is not in the best interest of the masses rather it is designed to initiate a totalitarian world or NWO. Enslavement of humanity is wrong.

Reply

Leave a Comment